Candlepower doesn't sell "HID kits". We easily could, and we'd make a lot of money doing it, but we never have and we never will. That's because they're dangerous and illegal.
Here's why:
An "HID kit" consists of HID ballasts and bulbs for retrofitting
into
a halogen headlamp. Kits for replacement of standard round or
rectangular sealed-beam headlamps usually include a poor-quality
replaceable-bulb headlight lens-reflector unit that's not safe or legal
even when equipped with the intended (usually H4) halogen bulb. Often,
these products are advertised using the name of a reputable lighting
company ("Real Philips kit! Real Osram kit! Real Hella kit!") to try to
give the potential buyer the illusion of legitimacy. On rare occasion,
some of the components in these kits did start out as legitimate HID
headlight bulbs made by reputable companies, but they are modified
(hacked) by the "HID kit" suppliers, and they aren't being put to their
designed or intended use. Reputable companies like Philips, Osram,
Hella, etc. never endorse this kind of hacked usage of their
products. Nevertheless, it's easy to get "HID kits" from China bearing
the
(unauthorized, counterfeit) brands of major, reputable companies. See this
page for just a few examples of the many packaging options offered
by just one Chinese maker of "HID kits".
Halogen headlamps and HID headlamps require very different optics to
produce a safe and effective—not to mention legal—beam
pattern. How come? Because of the very different characteristics of the
two kinds of light source.
A halogen bulb has a cylindrical light source: the glowing filament.
The space immediately surrounding the cylinder of light is completely
dark, and so the sharpest contrast between bright and dark is along the
edges of the cylinder of light. The ends of the filament cylinder fade
from bright to dark. An HID bulb, on the other hand, has a crescent-shaped
light source: the arc. It's crescent-shaped because as it passes through
the space between the two electrodes, its heat causes it to try to rise.
The space immediately surrounding the crescent of light glows in
layers...the closer to the crescent of light, the brighter the glow. The
ends of the arc crescent are the brightest points, and immediately beyond
these points is completely dark, so the sharpest contrast between bright
and dark is at the ends of the crescent of light.
These images shows the very different characteristics of the filament
versus the arc in terms of overall shape and luminance distribution. You can see that the filament is cylindrical and has a bright center dimming towards the ends, with a sharp light/dark edge formed by the sides of the filament coil and the empty space just outside the filament. The arc, on the other hand, is crescent-shaped. Its got bright ends and a fuzzy light/dark edge formed by the layers of the sides of the arc. Differently-shaped, differently-sized, and with a different distribution of light within it, the two light sources cannot be interchanged without spoiling the intended optical focus.
When designing the optics (lens and/or reflector) for a lamp, the
characteristics of the light source are the driving factor around
which
everything else must be engineered. If you go and change the light source,
you've done the equivalent of putting on somebody else's eyeglasses: You
can probably make them fit on your face OK, but you won't see
properly.
Here are some downloadable PDF tests done by DOT and CalCoast Labs
on halogen headlamps equipped with "HID kits":
And here is an English documentary showing the
results of
installing "HID kits" in
European-code headlamps designed to produce a sharp cutoff on low
beam:
You can read some of the United States Department of Transportation's (DOT) statements on the subject here,
here, here, and here—all
links will open in new windows. And you can read the German perspective here,
and the same from Hong Kong here,
and the same from New Zealand here and here. Some "HID kit" marketeers will try to tell you that the kits are
technically illegal only because the US headlamp laws are stuck in the
past. That's wrong; the world's experts and regulators all say the same
thing: Don't!
Now, what about the notion that it's OK to put "HID kits" into halogen projector headlights because the beam cutoff still
appears sharp? Don't be fooled; it's an error to judge a beam pattern
just by its cutoff. In many lamps, especially the projector types, the
cutoff will remain the same regardless of what light source is behind it.
Halogen bulb, HID bulb, cigarette lighter, firefly, hold it up to the
sun—whatever. That's because of the way a projector lamp works. The
cutoff is simply the projected image of a piece of metal running
side-to-side behind the lens. Where the optics come in is in distributing
the light under the cutoff. And, as with all other automotive lamps
(and, in fact, all optical instruments), the optics are calculated based
not just on where the light source is within the lamp (focal length) but
also the specific photometric characteristics of the light source...which
parts of it are brighter, which parts of it are darker, where the
boundaries of the light source are, whether the boundaries are sharp or
fuzzy, the shape of the light source, and so forth.
As if the optical mismatch weren't reason enough to drop the idea of
"retrofitting" an HID bulb where a halogen one belongs—and it
is!—there are even more reasons why not to do it. Here are some of
them:
The only available arc capsules have a longitudinal arc (arc path runs
front to back) on the axis of the bulb, but many popular halogen headlamp
bulbs, such as 9004, 9007, H3 and H12, use a filament that is transverse
(side-to-side) and/or offset (not on the axis of the bulb) central axis of
the headlamp reflector). In this case, it is impossible even to roughly
approximate the position and orientation of the filament with a "retrofit"
HID capsule. Just because your headlamp might use an axial-filament bulb,
though, doesn't mean you've jumped the hurdles—the laws of optical
physics don't bend even for the cleverest marketing department, nor for
the catchiest HID "retrofit" kit box.
A relatively new gimmick is HID arc capsules set in an electromagnetic
base so that they shift up and down or back and forth. These are being
marketed as "dual beam" kits that claim to address the loss of high beam
with fixed-base "retrofits" in place of dual-filament halogen bulbs like
9004, 9007, H4, and H13. A cheaper variant of this is one that uses a
fixed HID bulb with a halogen bulb strapped or glued to the side of
it...yikes! What you wind up with is two poorly-formed beams, at best. The
reason the original equipment market has not adopted the movable-capsule
designs they've been playing with since the mid 1990s is because it is
impossible to control the arc position accurately so it winds up in the
same position each and every time.
There are cars now coming from the factory with single-bulb, dual-beam HID
systems, generally called "BiXenon" lamps, but these all rely on a movable
optical shield, or movable reflector—the arc capsule stays in one
place. The Original Equipment engineers have a great deal of money and
resources at their disposal, and if a movable capsule were a practical way
to do the job, they'd do it. The "retrofit" kits certainly don't
address this problem anywhere near satisfaction. And even if they did,
remember: Whether a fixed or moving-capsule "retrofit" is contemplated,
solving the arc-position problem and calling it good is like going to a
hospital with two broken ribs, a sprained ankle and a crushed toe and
having the nurse say "Well, you're free to go home now, we've put your
ankle in a sling!" Focal length (arc/filament positioning) is only just
ONE issue out of several.
The most dangerous part of the attempt to "retrofit" Xenon headlamps is
that sometimes you get a deceptive and illusory "improvement" in the
performance of the headlamp. The performance of the headlamp is perceived
to be "better" because of the much higher level of foreground lighting (on
the road immediately in front of the car). However, the beam patterns
produced by this kind of "conversion" virtually always give less
distance light, and often an alarming lack of light where there's meant to
be a relative maximum in light intensity. The result is the illusion that
you can see better than you actually can, and that's not safe.
Headlamp beam performance is a lot more complicated than "more light" vs. "less light". There are particular amounts of light that need to go in specific directions, and it's not possible to assess the quality, safety, or performance of a beam pattern without a lot of
knowledge, a lot of training and a lot of special equipment, because
subjective perceptions are very misleading. Having a lot of strong light
in the foreground (on the road close to the car and out to the
sides) is very comforting and reliably produces a strong impression of
"good headlights". The problem is that not only is foreground lighting of
decidedly secondary importance when travelling much above 30 mph, but
having a very strong pool of light close to the car causes your pupils to
close down, worsening your distance vision...all the while giving
you this false sense of security. This is to say nothing of the massive
amounts of glare to other road users and backdazzle to you, the driver,
that results from these "retrofits".
HID headlamps also require careful weatherproofing and electrical
shielding because of the high voltages involved. These unsafe "retrofits"
make it physically possible to insert an HID bulb where a halogen bulb
belongs, but this practice is illegal and dangerous, regardless of claims
by these marketers that their systems are "beam pattern corrected" or the
fraudulent use of established brand names to try to trick you into
thinking the product is legitimate. In order to work correctly and safely,
HID headlamps must be designed from the start as HID headlamps.
What about the law, what does it have to say on the matter? In
virtually every first-world country, HID "retrofits" into halogen
headlamps are illegal. They're illegal clear across Europe and in all of
the many countries that use European ECE headlight regulations. They're
illegal in the US and Canada. Some people dismiss this because the regulations are written in such a manner as to
reject a lot of lights considered good and safe everywhere else in the world. Nevertheless, on the
particular count of HID "retrofits" into halogen headlamps, the world's
regulators and engineers all say DON'T!
The only safe and legitimate HID retrofit is one that replaces the
entire headlamp—that is lens, reflector, bulb...the
whole system—with optics designed and type-approved or manufacturer-certified for HID usage. In the
aftermarket, it is possible to use the growing number of
modular projector optics, and fabricate your own brackets and bezels, or to modify an
original-equipment halogen headlamp housing to contain optical "guts"
designed for HID usage (though it should be noted that breaking the seal of a composite headlamp assembly, installing HID optics and re-sealing the lens
creates major problems of its own, and does not result in a legal
headlamp).
From time to
time, we are asked to comment on what are marketed as "new developments" in
HID kits, and those who ask sometimes think these "new
developments" might render this article out-of-date. That is not the case, and never will be. Marketers will always be coming up with dazzling new
pseudoscience, tempting new hype and sneaky new ways of trying to convince
you to buy their stuff. It's what they do. This article will never go out
of date, because the problems with HID kits are conceptual
problems, not problems of implementation. Therefore, they cannot be
overcome by additional research and development, any more than someone
could develop a way for you to put on somebody else's eyeglasses and see
correctly.
This publication of this document is authorized by Daniel Stern